- Home
- Weapons Assault
Weapons Assault Lawyer in Brampton
Charged with weapons assault in Brampton? The charge is called assault with a weapon in the Criminal Code, under section 267(a). You are facing a hybrid offence carrying a maximum of ten years in prison. A conviction also brings a likely weapons prohibition order and a permanent criminal record. That record follows you into employment screening, immigration proceedings and travel to the United States. What you do in the first week matters. Vincent Houvardas is a criminal lawyer who has defended weapons charges from the same Brampton office since 1998, across Brampton, Mississauga and the rest of Peel Region.
What is weapons assault under section 267?
Weapons assault is the everyday name for the offence the Criminal Code calls assault with a weapon. It is committed when a person, while committing an assault, carries, uses or threatens to use a weapon or an imitation of one. It sits in section 267(a) of the Criminal Code. Assault causing bodily harm is 267(b), and choking, suffocating or strangling is 267(c).
The offence builds on the general definition of assault in section 265. The Crown has to prove the assault itself first — the intentional application of force without consent, or a threat or gesture that makes the complainant reasonably believe force is about to be applied. Only then does the weapon element come into play.
That two-part structure matters more than most people realise. If the underlying assault fails, the weapon element becomes irrelevant. A weapon does not turn a lawful act into an unlawful one.
Weapons assault charges are not rare, and they are becoming less rare. Police across Canada reported 87,500 incidents of level 2 assault — the Statistics Canada category covering assault with a weapon or causing bodily harm — in 2024, a rate of 212 per 100,000 people. Over the decade from 2014 to 2024, that rate climbed 67%. Common assault rose only 20% across the same period. Weapon-related assault charges have grown more than three times as fast as simple assault.
What counts as a weapon?
Much less than people expect. Section 2 of the Criminal Code defines a weapon as anything used, designed to be used, or intended for use in causing death or injury, or for the purpose of threatening or intimidating someone.
The critical language is “used “ or “intended for use.” An object’s status as a weapon isn’t determined by its original design—rather, it becomes a weapon based on its use in a particular situation. Peel police have applied section 267 charges to a range of objects including:
- Knives, box cutters and screwdrivers
- Bottles, glasses and drinking mugs
- Baseball bats, golf clubs and hockey sticks
- Rocks, bricks and pieces of construction material
- Household items — a frying pan, a phone, a lamp, a set of keys
- A vehicle, where it was driven at or toward a person
- Boots or shoes, where the allegation is a kick while wearing them
Two extensions catch people off guard. Imitation weapons count. A replica firearm, an airsoft pistol or a fake knife will support the charge. The section captures threatening use as well as actual use, so whether the object could have caused injury is beside the point. For the purposes of section 267, the definition also reaches anything used to bind or tie a person against their will.
Bare hands and feet are not weapons in themselves. That distinction is often the difference between a section 267 charge and simple assault under section 266. It is worth examining closely whenever the alleged weapon is an ordinary object that happened to be nearby.
Charges involving specific weapons
The object changes the case. Two weapons assault charges arising from similar altercations can carry very different exposure depending on what was in the accused’s hand, because different objects attract different companion charges
Knives and bladed objects
The most commonly charged weapon in Peel Region. A knife allegation frequently arrives stacked with possession of a weapon for a dangerous purpose under section 88, or carrying a concealed weapon under section 90. Those are separate charges with their own penalties, and they can survive even where the assault itself does not.
Vehicles
Driving at or toward a person can be charged as weapons assault. These cases usually turn on intent and on the reliability of the complainant’s account of distance and speed.
Everyday objects
A bottle, a tool, a phone, a set of keys. These cases are the most contestable, because the Crown has to establish that the object was used or intended for use to injure, threaten or intimidate.
If you have been charged with a specific weapon charge and want to know what companion charges typically follow, an assault with a weapon lawyer can tell you from the wording on your information sheet. Call 905-455-9970.
Weapons assault or assault causing bodily harm?
Section 267 contains three offences. Section 267(a) is assault with a weapon. Section 267(b) is assault causing bodily harm. Section 267(c) covers choking, suffocating or strangling.
They carry identical maximum penalties, and a person can be charged under more than one. Where a weapon was used and the complainant was injured, both 267(a) and 267(b) commonly appear on the same information.
The distinction matters for how the case is defended. A weapons charge turns on whether the object qualifies as a weapon in law. A bodily harm charge turns on whether the injury meets the legal threshold, which is more than trifling or transient. Our assault causing bodily harm page covers that second question in detail.
Penalties for weapons assault in Ontario
Assault with a weapon is a hybrid offence. The Crown chooses whether to proceed by indictment or by summary conviction, and that single decision shapes almost everything that follows.
Penalties
Maximum imprisonment
Mode of trial
Record suspension eligibility
Summary conviction
2 years less a day
Ontario Court of Justice
5 years after sentence expires
Indictment
10 years
Election available — OCJ, or Superior Court by judge alone or judge and jury
10 years after sentence expires
There is no mandatory minimum sentence for this offence. Non-custodial outcomes are available and realistic in the right case — a discharge, a suspended sentence with probation, or a conditional sentence. Sentencing courts do treat denunciation and deterrence as leading considerations where a weapon was involved. So the work is in the facts: what the object was, whether injury resulted, what the surrounding circumstances were, and what the accused’s record looks like.
Aggravating factors that push a case toward custody include serious injury and the use of a firearm or a bladed weapon. So do domestic circumstances, breach of an existing court order, and a prior record for violence. Where the complainant is an intimate partner and there is a prior conviction for intimate partner violence, an elevated maximum can apply on indictment.
Weapons prohibition orders. A conviction typically brings a firearms and weapons prohibition order under section 109 or 110 of the Criminal Code. Where the Crown proceeds by indictment on a section 267 charge, a prohibition order is generally mandatory rather than discretionary. That consequence catches out hunters, sport shooters and anyone whose work requires a firearms licence.
The consequences most people don't see coming
The sentence is rarely the part that does the most lasting damage.
Immigration status
This is the consequence we see hit hardest in Brampton. Assault with a weapon carries a maximum of ten years. That means a conviction meets the definition of serious criminality under section 36(1)(a) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act — regardless of the sentence actually imposed, and regardless of whether the Crown proceeded summarily. For a permanent resident, that means potential inadmissibility and a removal order. Where a sentence of six months or more is imposed, the right of appeal to the Immigration Appeal Division is lost. If you are not a Canadian citizen, tell your lawyer at the first meeting, before any position is taken on plea or sentence.
Employment
A conviction for a violent offence shows on a criminal record check. It also shows on the enhanced vulnerable sector check required for work in healthcare, education, childcare and long-term care. Regulated professions have their own reporting obligations.
Travel to the United States
US border officers treat assault with a weapon as a crime involving moral turpitude, which can make a person inadmissible. A waiver is possible but slow and expensive.
Firearms licensing
A prohibition order ends an existing PAL and blocks a future one for its duration.
Family law proceedings
Charges and conditions involving a family member frequently surface in parenting and access disputes.
How we defend weapons assault charges
There is no template. What there is, is a sequence of questions we work through in every one of these files.
Was there an assault at all?
The Crown has to prove the section 265 assault before the weapon element does anything. Complainant accounts in these cases are often given while the person is injured, intoxicated or angry. Inconsistencies between the 911 call, the officer’s notes and the eventual statement are common.
Was the object a weapon in law?
Where the alleged weapon is an ordinary object, the question is whether it was used or intended for use to injure, threaten or intimidate. That is a factual finding, and it is contestable.
Self-defence
Section 34 asks three things. Did you reasonably believe force was being used or threatened against you? Did you act for the purpose of defending yourself? Was your response reasonable in the circumstances? Who started it, whether a weapon was already in play on the other side, and whether there was any realistic way to withdraw all feed into that analysis.
Consent
In a genuinely mutual fight, consent can be relevant. Its limits were set by the Supreme Court in R v Jobidon, which held that consent does not apply where bodily harm is both intended and caused.
Identity
In bar fights, group altercations and late-night street incidents, identification is frequently the weakest link in the Crown’s case.
Charter compliance
How was the weapon found? Was the search lawful? Was there a proper arrest? Were you told of your right to counsel and given a real chance to use it? Breaches of sections 8, 9 and 10(b) can lead to evidence being excluded under section 24(2). In a weapons case, the excluded item is often the case.
Resolution
Not every file should go to trial. Where the evidence is strong, the work shifts to what can be negotiated. That might be a plea to simple assault under section 266, a peace bond under section 810 with the charge withdrawn, diversion where the accused has no record, or a joint submission that avoids a criminal record through a discharge.
What happens after you're charged in Brampton
In Brampton, criminal cases are handled at the A. Grenville and William Davis Courthouse, located at 7755 Hurontario Street. This facility serves as home to both the Ontario Court of Justice and the Superior Court of Justice for the Peel Region, meaning any charges laid within Peel — whether in Brampton, Mississauga, or Caledon — are prosecuted at this single location.
If you were released by police,
A conviction for a violent offence shows on a criminal record check. It also shows on the enhanced vulnerable sector check required for work in healthcare, education, childcare and long-term care. Regulated professions have their own reporting obligations.
If you were held for a bail hearing,
it will proceed in the Brampton bail court. Have a surety ready to attend with proof of income. Expect release conditions that may include no contact, a residence requirement, a weapons prohibition, and a curfew. Our bail hearings page covers what a surety needs to bring and what the court asks them.
Crown pre-trial and judicial pre-trial follow
Position, election, and possible resolution are discussed at both. Most section 267 files are decided in these meetings rather than at trial.
Your first appearance is administrative
Nothing is decided, and no plea is entered. Its purpose is to confirm counsel and set a date. You do not have to attend personally if a lawyer files a designation of counsel on your behalf. For most working clients, that alone is worth retaining a defence lawyer early.
Disclosure is provided by the Peel Crown Attorney's office
This often arrives in stages. It includes the police notes, statements, video, photographs and any 911 recordings. Video from a bar, a parking lot or a private residence is frequently the single most important item in a weapons case. It can also be overwritten within days if nobody moves quickly to preserve it. That is one of the strongest reasons to retain counsel immediately rather than waiting for a first court date.
Why Vincent Houvardas
Choosing a weapons assault lawyer in Brampton comes down to two questions: does this person know the offence, and do they know the courthouse?
Vincent Houvardas began his legal firm in Brampton in 1998 — originally at Kennedy and Clarence, beside the old Brampton courthouse, and since then from the office at 83 Kennedy Road South. Nearly three decades in the same city, in front of the same courts.
That longevity is not just a number on a page. The Crown attorneys, the judiciary and the duty counsel at the Davis Courthouse are people he has appeared before and negotiated with for years. Most section 267 files in this jurisdiction are resolved in Crown and judicial pre-trials rather than at trial. Those working relationships change what is achievable.
- Practising in Brampton since 1998 — the same practice, the same courthouse, the same community
- Past President, Peel Law Association
- Past President, Peel Criminal Lawyers Association
- Criminal defence exclusively, with a concentrated assault practice covering simple assault, domestic assault, weapons assault and assault causing bodily harm
- Extensive trial experience, and equally an experienced negotiator — including diversion and direct accountability where those routes are open
- Available 24 hours a day, including for arrests and weekend bail hearings
- Community involvement with the Peel Catholic School Board mock trial program, introducing high school students to the justice system
Files are handled personally. The lawyer you speak to at the consultation is the lawyer who appears in court. Fixed-fee quotes are provided up front — see our fees page.
The office is a five-minute drive from the A. Grenville and William Davis Courthouse, with free parking front and back. That is a practical detail, and it matters on a morning when you have a court appearance and a meeting with counsel on the same day.
